Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Myers v. Subia et al
as 2:2008cv00411
Petitioner:
Darrel L Myers
Respondent:
Rich Subia, Attorney General CA, Yolo County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Subia
as 2:2008at00143
Defendant:
Rich Subia
Petitioner:
Darryl George Rosen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosen v. Subia
as 2:2008cv00284
Respondent:
Rich Subia
Petitioner:
Darryl George Rosen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Subia et al
as 3:2008cv00758
Petitioner:
Darrel L. Myers
Respondent:
Rich Subia, Attorney General, Yolo County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Detore v. Subia, et al
as 2:2008cv00002
Petitioner:
Ernest DeTore
Respondent:
Rich Subia and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Proffitt v. Subia et al
as 2:2007cv02603
Petitioner:
Jerry Daniel Proffitt
Respondent:
Rich Subia, Attorney General's Office, Shasta County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owbridge v. Subia
as 3:2007cv05458
Petitioner:
Michael D. Owbridge
Respondent:
Rich Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price-Mahdi v. Subia
as 3:2007cv05343
Petitioner:
Joshua Price-Mahdi
Respondent:
Rich Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenny Inkwon Lee v. Rich Subia
as 2:2007cv03512
Petitioner:
Kenny Inkwon Lee
Respondent:
Rich Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trujillo v. Subia
as 2:2007cv00648
Petitioner:
Zachary Trujillo
Respondent:
Rich Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
