Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Benson v. Todd et al
as 3:2014cv01335
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
James D. Todd, Shelby County Government and Director of U.S. Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02314
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2013cv02989
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2013cv02817
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman, Tonya Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Echols et al
as 2:2013cv02686
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Patricia Echols, The Administration of the S.C.D.O.C. Medical Unit, Peninah Botwinick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2013cv02397
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv03066
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Morrow et al
as 2:2012cv03065
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
J. Morrow, D. Sanders, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv02768
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Morrow et al
as 2:2012cv02766
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
J. Morrow, D. Sanders, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
