Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCDONOUGH v. MABUS
as 1:2010cv01428
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
RAY MABUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DAVIS v. FULMER et al
as 1:2009cv02363
Plaintiff:
JACK DONNELL DAVIS
Defendant:
KYLE FULMER and ROBERT C. LOCKHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
IN RE: APPLICATION IMMUNIZING THE TESTIMONY OF, AND OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY EIGHT INDIVIDUAL WITNESSES IN THE IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION OF DISTRICT JUDGE G. THOMAS PORTEOUS, JR.
as 1:2009mc00424
Petitioner:
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Respondent:
ROBERT C. CREELY, JACOB J. AMATO, JR., WARREN FORSTALL and others
Cause Of Action: Application for Order Immunizing Testimony
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
