Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Austin v. Rhoades et al
as 3:2021cv00269
Defendant:
C/O Morris, Sgt. Royster, Robert Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
Lazerek Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01899
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Padilla v. Taylor et al
as 3:2020cv00057
Defendant:
C/O Royster, John Doe, Sgt. Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Snell et al
as 3:2019cv01019
Defendant:
K. Allsup, John R. Baldwin, C/O Fenton and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Scanlan et al
as 3:2019cv00757
Plaintiff:
Jovan Cooper
Defendant:
C/O Royster, J. Morris, C/O Scanlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royster v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07239
Plaintiff:
Catherine M Royster
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. , Abbott Laboratories , AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Royster et al
as 3:2013cv00662
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Virginia M Royster, Anita Harrington, State of Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Royster et al
as 1:2013cv04206
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Michelle Royster and City of Chicago Department of Water Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Royster et al
as 1:2012cv03445
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Michelle Royster, City of Chicago, Department of Water Management and Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
