Cases 11 - 20 of 23
MCARTHUR v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2020cv07316
Respondent:
GURBIR S. GREWAL, MARCUS O. HICKS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and others
Petitioner:
ALBERT MCARTHUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BORBON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2020cv07188
Petitioner:
JUAN BORBON
Respondent:
MARCUS O. HICKS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, ERIN NARDELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PECORENO v. PLUMERI, JR. et al
as 3:2019cv17314
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR.
Petitioner:
JOHN VINCENT PECORENO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELLIOTT v. THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2018cv08504
Plaintiff:
TARIQ ELLIOTT
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, ROBERT WALL, BASHITI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATOLA v. PLOUSIS
as 2:2017cv01535
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. PRATOLA
Defendant:
JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR., VOLETTE ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2016cv01434
Plaintiff:
WILFRED LEE HOLMES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, DAVID W. THOMAS, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANE v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv05281
Plaintiff:
RICHARD F. LANE
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv03746
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. TORREZ et al
as 1:2012cv03518
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WHITE
Defendant:
ERIC TORREZ, DAVID W. THOMAS, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
