Cases 11 - 20 of 84
King v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Lance King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04420
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez Saunders v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv03438
Plaintiff:
Marianne Lopez Saunders
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Radwane v. Stone & Saunders LLC
as 2:2022cv03358
Plaintiff:
Halim Radwane
Defendant:
Stone & Saunders LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Saunders v. Auto Owners Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gary Adam Saunders
Defendant:
Auto Owners Insurance Company and Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Saunders, Jr. et al v. Davol Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SAUNDERS and CHARLES SAUNDERS, JR.
Defendant:
Davol Inc., and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03163
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mickey Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02310
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders v. USA
as 1:2020cv00856
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Antonio W. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
