Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Simmons v. Carney et al
as 1:2021cv01142
Plaintiff:
Micheal D. Simmons
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Correction, Officer Stansbury, Bureau Chief Shane Troxler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Burns et al v. Mayne Pharma Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00248
Plaintiff:
Sue Burns, Alan Rash, Hazel Leggans and others
Defendant:
Does 1-50, Inclusive and Mayne Pharma Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. ERIC BERNARD SIMMONS TRUST
as 1:2019cv02355
Defendant:
ERIC BERNARD SIMMONS TRUST
Plaintiff:
Eric-Bernard Simmons
Garnishee:
Delaware Department of Corrections Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. ERIC BERNARD SIMMONS TRUST
as 1:2019cv02533
Defendant:
ERIC BERNARD SIMMONS TRUST
Plaintiff:
Eric-Bernard Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. Jurden
as 1:2019cv00213
Defendant:
President Judge Jan Jurden
Plaintiff:
Eric Bernard Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer et al v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01243
Plaintiff:
Annette Porter, Dionne Reisert, Sharon L. Reiter and others
Defendant:
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Pierce et al
as 1:2018cv00847
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Simmons
Defendant:
David Pierce, Marc Richman, Laurie Spraga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Matt Denn, Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
