Cases 11 - 20 of 24
JOHNSON v. D.C. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2016cv01721
Plaintiff:
WILBUR JOHNSON
Defendant:
D.C. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY and SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE ARCHIVES MUSEUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF MARY W. REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
as 1:2016cv00960
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF MARY W. REYNOLDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GRYDER v. VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv02142
Plaintiff:
KEN GRYDER
Defendant:
VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, RANDY BENDER , VINCE STROHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
SIMMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01158
Plaintiff:
INGRID SIMMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
EDEN v. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2012cv01739
Defendant:
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
BARBARA EDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
JULIUS v. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
as 1:2011cv00911
Plaintiff:
TYRONE JULIUS
Defendant:
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
