Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Sorensen et al v. Yonek, et al
as 3:2010cv05408
Defendant:
Jeffrey C. Yonek
Plaintiff:
Debora Sorensen and Tracy Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Averitt v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2010cv05168
Plaintiff:
Anthony Averitt
Defendant:
State of Washington, Pierce County, City of Tacoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 2:2009cv00827
Plaintiff:
Robert Collins, David Pollino, Susanna Gouws Korn and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Collins et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 2:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
Robert Collins, David Pollino, Susanna Gouwe Korn and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Sorensen v. Fidelity National Financial Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00412
Plaintiff:
Dawn T Sorensen, Dawn T Sorensen, Dawn T Sorensen and others
Defendant:
Fidelity National Financial Inc, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Ticor Title Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Paulsen v. Sorensen et al
as 2:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
James R. Paulsen
Defendant:
E. Brian Sorensen and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Paulsen v. Sorensen et al
as 2:2008mc00015
Plaintiff:
James R. Paulsen
Defendant:
E. Brian Sorensen and Internal Revenue Service
Sorensen v. Standard Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv01007
Plaintiff:
Greta Sorensen
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
