Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Cotto v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv01586
Petitioner:
Mario Cotto
Respondent:
Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia and Florida Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Flordia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Snider v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00835
Petitioner:
Charles Edwin Snider
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blige v. Kelier et al
as 1:2011cv00137
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Blige
Respondent:
J. A. Kelier and United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mathews v. Warden et al
as 1:2010cv02960
Petitioner:
Alec Mathews
Respondent:
Warden, United States Penitentiary and Atlanta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia
as 1:2010cv02538
Petitioner:
Derrick Jones
Respondent:
United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Da'Wan v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv01995
Petitioner:
Jesse Jameel Da'Wan
Respondent:
Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Simmons v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv01626
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Simmons
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Loren Grayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Royster v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta et al
as 1:2008cv01781
Petitioner:
Michael Royster
Respondent:
Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta and Lexington Kentucky, Board of Parole and Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
