Cases 11 - 20 of 28
McLeod v. Brady et al.
as 1:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Steven A. McLeod
Defendant:
M. Jane Brady, Sharon Agnew, Susan Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Steven McLeod v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-11062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN A. MCLEOD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL CREWS, Former Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, CORIZON HEALTH INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steven McLeod v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 15-12967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN A. MCLEOD
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and others
In re: Steven McLeod
as 15-12089
Petitioner:
In re: STEVEN A. MCLEOD
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCLEOD v. CORIZON HEALTH INC
as 4:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A MCLEOD
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC, JULIE JONES, MICHAEL CREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. JONES
as 4:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A MCLEOD
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, MICHAEL CREWS, CORIZON HEALTH INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven McLeod v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-10851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN A. MCLEOD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HUDSON, Assistant Warden of Operations-DOC, CORIZON HEALTH INC., Private Medical Provider and others
Steven McLeod v. A. Lee Bentley, III, et al
as 14-14339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN A. MCLEOD
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION (FBI)
MCLEOD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A MCLEOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CREWS, CORIZON HEALTH INC, HODGSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
