Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Stevens v. Harper et al
as 3:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Stevens
Defendant:
Harper, Dave Still and Breana Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STILL v. AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 7:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
PAIGE STILL
Defendant:
AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and DISABILITY REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. The Khoshnood Law Firm, P.C. et al
as 1:2013cv03026
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
The Khoshnood Law Firm, P.C., Hooman Khoshnood and Clinton A. Still
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Still v. Khoshnood Law Firm PC et al
as 1:2013cv00748
Plaintiff:
Clinton A. Still
Defendant:
Khoshnood Law Firm PC and Hooman Khoshnood
Joseph M. Still Burn Centers, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Still Burn Centers, Inc.
Defendant:
Blue Cross And Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. and Blue Cross and Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Misty Creek et al v. Still
as 1:2012cv02827
Plaintiff:
Misty Creek and R James Properties Inc.
Defendant:
Robin Still
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US Bank National Association v. Still
as 1:2012cv01133
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Laura H. Still
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Turner
as 6:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Sony/ATV Songs LLC , ABKCO Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Theodore Turner
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Woody v. Walden et al
as 2:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Roger Stanley Woody
Defendant:
Neal Walden, Jr. and Robyn Still
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Still v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2010cv03813
Plaintiff:
Loyce Still
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
