Cases 11 - 17 of 17
STANLEY v. FISHER et al
as 5:2011cv03040
Petitioner:
JAMES STANLEY
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. ROZUM et al
as 5:2010cv04412
Petitioner:
IVAN BLAIR DAVIS
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BETANCOURT v. FOLINO et al
as 5:2010cv03450
Petitioner:
LUIS BETANCOURT
Respondent:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROOKS v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 5:2009cv05120
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT BROOKS
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. PIAZZA et al
as 2:2007cv05211
Petitioner:
ISHMAEL B. TAYLOR
Respondent:
JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS, COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TIERNO v. WAGNER et al
as 2:2007cv03218
Petitioner:
WILLIAM TIERNO
Respondent:
GEORGE WAGNER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, PA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FAVINGER v. WYNDER et al
as 2:2007cv00794
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT FAVINGER
Respondent:
JAMES T WYNDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, PENN. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
