Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Perez v. Wright et al
as 0:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Kenneth W. Wright, E. Paul Willingham and Schoolstart Company 401(k) P/S Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Bonner et al
as 0:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
John Bonner, Bonner & Borhart, LLP and Bonner & Borhart, LLP SIMPLE IRA Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. BNSF Railway Company
as 0:2014cv04802
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101
Perez et al v. State County & Municipal Employees' AFL-CIO Local 3931 et al
as 0:2014cv04645
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
State County & Municipal Employees' AFL-CIO Local 3931 and Thomas Zweber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Perez v. I.Q. Marketing, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv03187
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
I.Q. Marketing, Inc., Janet Finken and I.Q. Marketing, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Subway of Buffalo, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv03074
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Subway of Buffalo, Inc. and Marvin Baugus
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Fletcher et al
as 0:2014cv02966
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Gregory Fletcher and SLP Machine Simple IRA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Pro Systems Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv01326
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Pro Systems Corporation, Pro Resources Corporation, MICROPRO, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Jochims et al
as 0:2014cv00132
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Stephanie J. Jochims, Robert C. Jochims and Western Steel Erection 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Boschwitz et al
as 0:2013cv03572
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Gerald Boschwitz, Thomas Boschwitz, Home Valu, Inc. doing business as Home Value Interiors and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
