Cases 11 - 20 of 107
Altamirano v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-3953
Petitioner / Appellant:
HENRY ALTAMIRANO
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT, Warden and NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hardiman v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Andre Hardiman
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, Mr. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Ivan Cotton
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilcox v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-2897
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS FRANK WILCOX
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Palmer v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Markiece Palmer
Defendant:
Tim Garrett, David Rivas, Erin Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00457
Petitioner:
Nicholas Frank Wilcox
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barral v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00438
Petitioner:
Dustin James Barral
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez-Delgado v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00412
Petitioner:
Luigy Lopez-Delgado
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Volosin v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Jeffrey David Volosin
Respondent:
Tim Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian O'Keefe v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 23-15977
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KERRY O'KEEFE
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
