Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Maple Drive Farms Family Limit, et al v. Tom Vilsack We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1091
Plaintiff: MAPLE DRIVE FARMS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Plaintiff - Appellant: NICHOLAS H. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: TOM VILSACK, Secretary United States Department of Agriculture
Nick Koretoff, et al v. Tom Vilsack We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-5075
Plaintiff - Appellant: Nick Koretoff, doing business as Nick Koretoff Ranches, John Pryor, Paula Echabarne, doing business as Mallard Bend Farms and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Sam Cabal, Cynthia Lashbrook, doing business as Riverdance Farms, Dan Hyman, doing business as D & S Ranches and others
Defendant - Appellee: Tom Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-5194
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1013
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-17900
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Lucious Abrams, Jr. v. Tom Vilsack, et al
as 09-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant: Lucious Abrams, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: Tom Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?