Cases 11 - 20 of 679
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Defendant:
TDCJ Jordan Unit, Tammy Shelby, Aventiv Technologies and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harrison and Gregory Jay Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trinh v. Tran
as 4:2024cv02113
Defendant:
Minh-Tam Tammy Tran
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Rabon v. SSI SSD et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration, FNU Smith, FNU Heard and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Rabon
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Eaton v. MidFirst Bank
as 5:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Tammy Eaton
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Zeiger v. Mosley et al
as 4:2024cv02093
Defendant:
Mosley's Frenchies & Services LLC and George W Mosley
Plaintiff:
Tammy Zeiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Elliott v. Aldi (Texas) LLC
as 4:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
Tammy Elliott
Defendant:
Aldi (Texas) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Smith v. Guled H, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tammy Bocanegra Smith
Defendant:
Guled H, LLC and Ahmed Addi Ismaaiil
Other:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00340
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Petitioner:
Tammy J Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MidFirst Bank v. Wilson et al
as 3:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
MidFirst Bank
Defendant:
David Wilson, Gloria Ceril, Nathan Maize and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
