Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Noldem Associates LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01985
Plaintiff:
Terrell Thomas
Defendant:
Noldem Associates LLC, Subway Real Estate Corp. and JDH Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Greystone Owner LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01040
Plaintiff:
Terrell Thomas
Defendant:
Greystone Owner LLC and Carmine's Braodway Feast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Thomas v. Cohen et al
as 1:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Terrell Thomas
Defendant:
Howard Robert Cohen, Joseph L. Laib Jr., Joan B. Laib and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. 930 Third Ave Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv09300
Plaintiff:
Terrell Thomas
Defendant:
930 Third Ave Corp. , Jonrocman 930, LLC and The Johnny Rockets Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Thomas v. BCRE West 72 LLC et al
as 1:2012cv09299
Plaintiff:
Terrell Thomas
Defendant:
BCRE West 72 LLC, MDA West 72 LLC, 27 West 72 Gourmet Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Thomas v. McDonald's Real Estate Company of Columbia et al
as 1:2012cv06769
Plaintiff:
Terrell Thomas
Defendant:
McDonald's Real Estate Company of Columbia and McDonald's Restaurants of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
