Cases 11 - 20 of 12,399
RITCHIE v. VORTEX SPRING ADVENTURES LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Ritchie
Defendant:
Vortex Spring Adventures, LLC and Daryl R. Dockery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. State of Florida (Hendry)
as 2:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Johnson
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JADUE v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22106
Plaintiff:
SERGIO JADUE
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., AMAZON STUDIOS, LLC, AMAZON VIDEO BRASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Wandell v. Buck et al
as 8:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Wandell
Defendant:
Benjamin Waldo Buck and Thomas Charles Fielding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Neese
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
David cook
Defendant:
thomas neese, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Caballero v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Magin Luis Caballero
Defendant:
United States of America and The United States Department of the Navy
Intervenor:
Alamdar Hamdani, Daniel Hu and Thomas M Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Le Clerc v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff T.K. Waters, M. Clark, W. Thomas, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougall v. Yellow Card Renovations LLC
as 5:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Thomas McDougall
Defendant:
Yellow Card Renovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gomez v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Adrian J. Gomez
Defendant:
Antonio Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
