Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Carroll v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50318
Petitioner:
Craig Carroll
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McNatt v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50277
Petitioner:
Christopher McNatt
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson and Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Farrington v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50250
Petitioner:
Tavares L. Farrington
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Marier v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50246
Petitioner:
Marc Marier
Respondent:
B. Thomas and Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilson, Jr. v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50200
Petitioner:
James Earl Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
Bergami, Gonziles, Jr., Thomas Bergami and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sykes v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50135
Petitioner:
Terrance Sykes
Respondent:
Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Collier v. Gonzalez
as 3:2022cv50140
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Collier
Respondent:
D. Gonzalez and Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oliver v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Arrington Oliver
Defendant:
David Gonzales, Thomas Bergami and Wardens of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oliver v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50108
Plaintiff:
Arrington Oliver
Defendant:
David Gonzales, Thomas Bergami and Wardens of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fly v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2020cv00902
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Joint Prisoner Transport Systems, U.S. Public Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly, Tony Fly, Toniya Fly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
