Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Perez v. The County of Northumberland, Pennsylvania
as 4:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
The County of Northumberland, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez et al v. Tarry Bratton, BC, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00719
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez , Secretary of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Tarry Bratton, BC, Inc. and BC, Inc., 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. VICTOR PAVING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00383
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
VICTOR PAVING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and VICTOR E. ZENI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. LAS MARGARITAS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LAS MARGARITAS, INC. , FELIPE PEREZ and VICTOR PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
URRUTIA Y URRUTIA et al v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2016cv01351
Plaintiff:
JUAN URRUTIA Y URRUTIA and ROMULO DE PAZ BRITO
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , PORTIA WU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 070
PEREZ v. LLOYD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01079
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LLOYD INDUSTRIES, INC. and WILLIAM P. LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
PEREZ v. PHILADELPHIA COMMITTEE FOR THE PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS
as 2:2016cv01030
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COMMITTEE FOR THE PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. IFCO Systems N.A., Inc.
as 1:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Perez and Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
IFCO Systems N.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Perez v. Linde Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Linde Corporation and Scott Linde
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
PEREZ v. ENCORIUM GROUP, INC.
as 2:2015cv05365
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
ENCORIUM GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
