Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Arcababa, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Inc , Hot Cha Music Co. , Unichappell Music Inc. and others
Defendant:
Arcababa, Inc. and Alfredo Hinojosa
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Mario & Max, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv02729
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Songs of Universal, Inc. , Benny Bird Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mario & Max, Inc. and Mario Guerrina
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. REYNOLDS RADIO, INC. d/b/a KAZE-FM et al
as 6:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , AMAZEMENT MUSIC , BEEN JAMMIN MUSIC and others
Defendant:
REYNOLDS RADIO, INC. d/b/a KAZE-FM and KENNETH R REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Fuentes et al
as 6:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Cotillion Music, Inc, Nancy Hall Stafford and others
Defendant:
Victor Fuentes, Jr. and Nick Fuentes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Vicci, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00981
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., Stone Diamond Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Vicci, Inc., Hussein Ali Yassine and Michael Yassine
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. BAY CITY MICHAEL'S CLUB et al
as 3:2007cv00531
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., SONY/ATV SONGS LLC d/b/a SONY/ATV TREE PUBLISHING, UNIVERSAL-SONGS OF POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Defendant:
BAY CITY MICHAEL'S CLUB, SADIQ ALI DOSANI, and SALIMAH DOSANI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Albany
as 3:2007cv00760
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Inc, Broadcast Music Inc, Sony/ATV Songs LLC and others
Defendant:
William Joseph Albany
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
