Cases 11 - 20 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 U.S. Services Employment/Reemployment Act of 1994
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04169
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United Parcel Service Inc. v. Cherry
as 1:2022cv02874
Plaintiff:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth Cherry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brown et al v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01672
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brown, Ronnie Suveg, Joseph Bobertz and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service of America, Inc., the Administrative Committee of the UPS Retirement Plan and the Board of Trustees of the UPS Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Williamson
as 1:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Andy T. Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Yardley v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cathryn Yardley
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
