Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hossain v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02833
Defendant:
UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC.
Plaintiff:
ZEBIN HOSSAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 7:2021cv03117
Plaintiff:
Aliyah Anderson
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Wiggins et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01964
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc. and Unilever United States, Inc. doing business as Dove
Plaintiff:
REBECCA TORRES and CRAIG WIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Falborn v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 7:2020cv04138
Plaintiff:
Joyce Falborn
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Stewart III v. Unilever United States, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05993
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc. and Conopco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Bryce Stewart III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Derchin et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03543
Plaintiff:
Steve Altes, Jane Doe, Richard Feleppa and others
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03563
Plaintiff:
Brittany Brown, John Doe (Florida), John Doe (Illinois) and others
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bimont et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07749
Plaintiff:
Timba Bimont and John Doe
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
