Cases 11 - 20 of 23
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 20-1261
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Entergy Arkansas, LLC, Prairie Power, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 20-1182
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, a subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Trade Commission v. Peabody Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Arch Coal, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and OGE Energy Corp.
Intervenor:
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Southwestern Electric Power Company and others
Interested Party:
Morrison & Foerster LLP, Alliant Energy, Caterpillar Inc. and others
Petitioner:
NRG Energy, Inc., The Southern Company, DTE Energy Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Texas Municipal Power Agency and Western Coal Traffic League
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMEREN MISSOURI et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv02940
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMEREN MISSOURI, AMEREN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 16-1449
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, agent of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois, d/b/a Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 16-1325
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, ALLETE, Inc., for its operating division Minnesota Power (and its subsidiary Superior Water, L&P), Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Organization of MISO States, Inc.
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 16-1326
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, ALLETE, Inc., for its operating division Minnesota Power (and its subsidiary Superior Water, L&P), d/b/a Minnesota Power, Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Organization of MISO States, Inc., South Mississippi Electric Power Association and Resale Power Group of Iowa
Sierra Club v. EPA, et al
as 16-1318
Petitioner:
Sierra Club
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Gina McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri
Ameren Services Company, et al v. FERC
as 16-1304
Petitioner:
Ameren Services Company, Ameren Illinois Company, Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Ameren Services Company, et al v. FERC
as 16-1150
Petitioner:
Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois and Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, American Transmission Company, LLC, Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
