Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 55
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Pestmaster Services, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02120
Defendant: Pestmaster Services, Inc., Jeffrey M. Van Diepen, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: E. & J. Gallo Winery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Pestmaster Services, Inc., a California corporation et al
as 2:2019at01007
Plaintiff: E. & J. Gallo Winery
Defendant: Jeffrey M. Van Diepen, Pestmaster Services, Inc., a California corporation and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper et al v. Santa Maria Valley Water Conservation District et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv08696
Defendant: Santa Maria Valley Water Conservation District, Department of Interior, Brenda Burman, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: Los Padres Forestwatch and San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
The Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv03078
Plaintiff: The Klamath Tribes
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation , United States Fish And Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service
Intervenor_dft: Klamath Water Users Association , Sunnyside Irrigation District and Ben DuVal
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Yurok Tribe et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv06863
Plaintiff: Yurok Tribe , Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations , Institute for Fisheries Resources and others
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation and National Marine Fisheries Service
Intervenor_dft: Klamath Water Users Association , Sunnyside Irrigation District , Ben DuVal and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
North Coast Rivers Alliance et al v. Salazar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00001
Plaintiff: Friends of the River, Winnemem Wintu Tribe, North Coast Rivers Alliance and others
Defendant: Michael P. Jackson, Kenneth Salazar, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
North Coast Rivers Alliance et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2016at00161
Plaintiff: North Coast Rivers Alliance , California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
North Coast Rivers Alliance, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00307
Plaintiff: North Coast Rivers Alliance , California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01201
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , California Water Impact Network , AquAlliance and others
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation , Sally Jewell , Thomas Howard and others
Unknown: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority
Intervenor_defendant: Oakdale Irrigation District and South San Joaquin Irrigation District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 2:2015at00641
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , California Water Impact Network, AquAlliance and others
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation, Sally Jewell, THOMAS HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?