Cases 11 - 20 of 32
State of New York v. United States Department of Co
as 19-212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant:
Ron S. Jarmin, in his capacity as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Census Bureau, an agency within the United States Department of Commerce, Wilbur L. Ross, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, Steven Dillingham, in his official capacity as Director of the Census and others
United States Conference of Ma v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-2734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
City of Evanston et al v. Sessions
as 1:2018cv04853
Plaintiff:
The United States Conference of Mayors and City of Evanston
Defendant:
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III
Amicus Curiae:
State of Texas and Mayors of the Cities of Allen, Celina, College Station, Farmers Branch, Mason, and Midland, Texas; Pensacola, Florida, and the Former Mayor of Little Elm, Texas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State Of New York et al v. United States Department of Commerce et al
as 1:2018cv02921
Plaintiff:
State Of New York , State Of Connecticut , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce , Bureau of the Census , Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv02325
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, MARIA DE LA CRUZ PERALES SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
DUKE C. ELAINE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Amicus Curiae:
CAPITAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE, MASSACHUSETTS LAW REFORM INSTITUTE (MLRI) and others
Petitioner:
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO, CUNY DREAMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant:
6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS et al v. GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE CO.
as 1:2016cv00660
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS and UNITED STATES MAYOR ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Natl. Alliance of Forest Owner v. EPA, et al
as 15-1478
Petitioner:
National Alliance of Forest Owners
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, Baltimore, MD and others
The North American Coal Corp. v. EPA, et al
as 15-1451
Petitioner:
The North American Coal Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
