Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Epplett v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Susan Epplett
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bates v. United Of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv11706
Plaintiff:
Angela Bates
Defendant:
United Of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harris v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv10948
Plaintiff:
Ambria T Harris
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hall v. Troy Design & Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2021cv12975
Plaintiff:
Rita Hall
Defendant:
Troy Design & Manufacturing Co. and United Of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Prein v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
Catherine A. Prein
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Miller v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00417
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Sarah Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Fordyce v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv10954
Plaintiff:
David Fordyce
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Murray v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A. Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Singleton v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv12898
Plaintiff:
Marsha Singleton
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Cheung v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv11495
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Edward Cheung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
