Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Swain et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02168
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amcord Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Swain and Kathy Swain
HARTSFIELD et al v. ALBAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv61096
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK B HARTSFIELD, FREDERICK B HARTSFIELD, FREDERICK B HARTSFIELD and others
Defendant:
ALBAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY, BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Willie Gill v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2009cv06952
Plaintiff:
Willie Gill, Willie Gill and Jeanetta Gill
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, American Standard, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
ARNOLD et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv70110
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARNOLD, BRUCE ARNOLD, BRUCE ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hixson v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 3:2009cv02187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hixson and Thomas Hixson
Defendant:
Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Trane US, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
OXFORD v. A.H. VOSS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62904
Plaintiff:
RICKY GENE OXFORD
Defendant:
A.H. VOSS COMPANY, A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Oxford v. A.H. Voss Company, et al
as 3:2001cv00869
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gene Oxford
Defendant:
A.H. Voss Company, ACandS, Inc., Atlas Turner Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
