Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bulgari, S.p.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Bulgari, S.p.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Eric Hoffman, Zhierna Sunnyer Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Titus v. Does 10-20 et al
as 3:2017cv01315
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
John Does 10-20, Major Westfall, C/O Caron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01258
Plaintiff:
Tuan C. Fields, Sr.
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01259
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Elias Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01260
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaney v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Blaney
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Hoppensted et al
as 3:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
James Hoppensted, Lieutenant Whitley, Kent Brookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz, Jesse R. Perez, Marcus A. Barry and others
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castile v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, C/O Dillingham, C/O Vecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
