Cases 11 - 20 of 35
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP v. MACRONIX INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD et al
as 1:2016cv00519
Plaintiff:
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
Defendant:
MACRONIX INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD and MACRONIX AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Winston & Strawn, LLP v. Crumens Ltd C/O Johnson, et al
as 14-7197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Winston & Strawn, LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
Crumens Ltd C/O Johnson & Mclean LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
James P. Mclean, Jr.
Damian v. Grossman et al
as 1:2014cv10000
Plaintiff:
Melanie E. Damian
Defendant:
Jay Bruce Grossman, JB Grossman, P.A., Timothy Carey and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Damian v. Grossman et al
as 1:2014cv23475
Plaintiff:
Melanie E. Damian
Defendant:
Jay Bruce Grossman, JB Grossman, P.A., Timothy Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP v. THE LAW FIRM OF JOHN ARTHUR EAVES
as 1:2013cv01940
Plaintiff:
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
Defendant:
LAW FIRM OF JOHN ARTHUR EAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP v. CRUMENS LTD C/O JOHNSON & MCLEAN LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
Defendant:
CRUMENS LTD C/O JOHNSON & MCLEAN LLC and JAMES P. MCLEAN, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Leggiadro Ltd. et al v. Winston & Strawn, LLP.
as 1:2012cv05066
Plaintiff:
Leggiadro Ltd. , Brooks Ross and Ann Ross
Defendant:
Winston & Strawn, LLP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
