Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Wolf v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Debra Field, David McCluskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patent Holder, LLC. v. Lone Wolf Distributors, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Patent Holder, LLC.
Defendant:
Lone Wolf Distributors, Inc. and Lone Wolf R&D, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Homburg v. Kerr et al
as 1:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jason Homburg
Defendant:
Michael Kerr and Graye Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grijalva v. IDOC et al
as 4:2015cv00426
Petitioner:
Raymond Grijalva, II
Respondent:
IDOC, SAWC and James Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hogan et al v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Hogan and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Kevin Kempf, Jeff Zmuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Wolf et al v. McCall Aviation, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Tina L Wolf , Breanna J. Wolf , Jaclyn M Wolf and others
Defendant:
McCall Aviation, Inc., McCall Air, Salmon Air and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolf v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J.R. Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds et al v. Sandy et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Allan P Reynolds and Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, J.R. Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
William Wolfe
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Brent Reinke, Corizon Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
