Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Nilson et al v. Walker et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
David Mark Nilson and Cherie Nilson
Defendant:
Adam Walker, Dustin Ericson, Tiffany Lannefeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walker v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Angelyn Walker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Ogden Regional Airport Association et al v. Ogden City Airport et al
as 1:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Durbano Properties, Wendy Marsell, Wayne Law and others
Defendant:
Ogden City Airport and Ogden City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. RRTC Holdings et al
as 2:2021cv00276
Defendant:
RRTC Holdings and David Resendes
Plaintiff:
Flins A. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker v. Stake Center Locating
as 2:2021cv00183
Defendant:
Stake Center Locating
Plaintiff:
Dustin Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Beecher Walker & Associates v. Kalthia Construction and Management
as 2:2020cv00810
Defendant:
Kalthia Construction and Management
Plaintiff:
Beecher Walker & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doepner v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2020cv00111
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Doepner
Defendant:
Joshua Cox, State of Utah, Rodrigo Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Jon Buck, Benjamin Painter, Don Coleman and others
Defendant:
GoSmith, Porch.com, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Walker Edison Furniture v. DiCentral Corporation
as 2:2020cv00128
Plaintiff:
Walker Edison Furniture
Defendant:
DiCentral Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
