Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. Sandra Evan
as 10-35237
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC, a Washington limited liability company, KENNETH EVANS, individual resident of Washington State, JOHN WAYNE JONES, individual resident of Washington State and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State
Wapato Heritage LLC v. USA, et al
as 09-36150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Sandra Evans v. USDCSPO
as 09-73437
:
In re: SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State
Petitioner:
SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State
Respondent:
USDC, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC, a Washington limited liability company, KENNETH EVANS, individual resident of Washington State, JOHN WAYNE JONES, individual resident of Washington State and others
Grondal et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
Paul Grondal, Paul Grondal, Mill Bay Members Association Inc and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Wapato Heritage LLC v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
Wapato Heritage LLC, Wapato Heritage LLC and Wapato Heritage LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Wapato Heritage LLC et al v. Evans et al
as 2:2007cv00314
Plaintiff:
Wapato Heritage LLC, Wapato Heritage LLC, Kenneth Evans and others
Defendant:
Sandra D Evans and Dan Gargan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
