Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Sweeting v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 1:2019cv00127
Respondent:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Deionandrea Sweeting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Turner
as 3:2019cv00150
Respondent:
warden north central correctional institution and Warden Neil Turner
Petitioner:
arnon collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eli v. Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2018cv01742
Respondent:
Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Martez Eli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00738
Petitioner:
Steven A Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Russell v. Warden, N. Central Corr Inst
as 17-3762
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. RUSSELL
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Artz v. Turner
as 3:2017cv00231
Petitioner:
Greg M Artz
Respondent:
Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00490
Petitioner:
Charles H Nguyen
Respondent:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Charles H Nguyen
Defendant:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017oe00467
Plaintiff:
Charles H Nguyen
Defendant:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Russell v. Warden, N Central Corr Inst
as 17-3251
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. RUSSELL
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.