Cases 11 - 20 of 1,275
CELANO v. CUZZUPE et al
as 1:2024cv06954
Plaintiff:
LEE-ANTHONY CELANO
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN CUZZUPE and NURSE JENNINE MECHOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DE LIMA v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06925
Petitioner:
PEDRO VICIOSO DE LIMA
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ESPANARUIZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06930
Petitioner:
JHON JAIRO ESPANARUIZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06864
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ ENAMORADO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06939
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER GOMEZ-ENAMORADO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERRI v. WARDEN OF F.C.I. FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06767
Petitioner:
BRIAN A. PERRI
Respondent:
WARDEN OF F.C.I. FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VILLALONA v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv06696
Petitioner:
STEVEN VILLALONA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BELL v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv06504
Petitioner:
KENT BELL
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDGE FRANCIS A. MCGROGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRYANT v. R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv06417
Petitioner:
RONNIE L. BRYANT
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMAD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06416
Petitioner:
IBN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN OF FAIRTON FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
