Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Wingfield v. Warden, USP Coleman 1
as 5:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
James Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wingfield v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Defendant:
FNU Harr, FNU Bolstick, FNU Withers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WINGFIELD v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv22742
Plaintiff:
LORETTA WINGFIELD
Defendant:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wingfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv02377
Plaintiff:
Gary Wingfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
WINGFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45779
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINGFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46715
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUAL RANDALL WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINGFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03681
Plaintiff:
DARREN WINGFIELD
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINGFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03976
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGHSMITH et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01186
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BROWN, JONATHAN HESS, JAMES WINGFIELD and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. Ginn & Patrou, P.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Mark Taylor
Defendant:
Ginn & Patrou, P.A. and Gables at Wingfield Townhomes Owners Association, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
