Cases 11 - 20 of 8,377
Singleton v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
John U. Singleton
Defendant:
G. Leposky, Lightfoot, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv05233
Plaintiff:
DeLaurence Hoskins
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Off. Williams, Mayor of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirchner v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirchner
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. John Doe's 1-11 et al
as 3:2024cv50232
Plaintiff:
Sally Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe's 1-11, Jennifer Rold and Courtney Fectz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gress v. Klip-It LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04912
Plaintiff:
Dr. William P. Gress
Defendant:
Klip-It LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Span v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, LaToya Hughes and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv03152
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
Brittany Green, Tara Goins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Northwestern University
as 1:2024cv04831
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Defendant:
Northwestern University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Spencer v. Mock et al
as 1:2024cv04829
Plaintiff:
Cuddellous Spencer
Defendant:
Howard Mock, Sullivan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
