Cases 11 - 20 of 49,904
Griggs v. Department of Correctional
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Curtis Griggs
Defendant:
Department of Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Angelo v. Filicetti et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Carlo Robert D'Angelo
Defendant:
Michael Filicetti and Mehmet Kirk Okay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03227
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tisdale v. USA
as 6:2024cv06256
Petitioner:
Marquis Tisdale
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Young v. USA
as 6:2024cv06253
Petitioner:
James Oliver Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03150
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Glenn Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Correction Department, C.O. Ceesay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covial v. Francillion et al
as 1:2024cv03125
Plaintiff:
Brandon A. Covial
Defendant:
Marvin Francillion, Ashley Duncan-Peters, Chris Budhan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Janczuk v. United States of America (USA) et al
as 1:2024cv03128
Petitioner:
Weronika E.K. Janczuk
Respondent:
United States of America (USA), New York (NY) State, Connecticut (CT) State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
