Cases 11 - 20 of 471
Phelps v. DOE et al
as 4:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
Yolanda DOE, CEO of E.A.H. Housing, Angela DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adams v. Community Housing Partnership
as 3:2023cv06073
Plaintiff:
Amy Adams
Defendant:
Community Housing Partnership doing business as HomeRise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Currie v. Catholic Charities et al
as 3:2023cv05735
Plaintiff:
Minnie Kelly Currie
Defendant:
Catholic Charities, Esmeralda Michaels and Gaby Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Nickerson et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06488
Plaintiff:
Amy Nickerson, Hardy Nickerson, Sr. and Hardy Nickerson, Jr.
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP v. Pierre
as 5:2023cv05702
Plaintiff:
First and Rosemary Senior Housing, LP
Defendant:
George Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Vasin v. CWPM, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv04834
Plaintiff:
Nataliya Vasin
Defendant:
CWPM, INC., dba CAL-WESTERN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Christopher Nelson, Su-An Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Escamilla et al v. Echelon Communities, LLC
as 3:2023cv03132
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Escamilla and Luisa Cordero
Defendant:
Echelon Communities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Shakti Hotels Inc v. Choudhry
as 5:2023cv03560
Plaintiff:
Shakki Hotel Inc and Shakti Hotels, Inc.
Defendant:
Khurrumm Choudhry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United States of America v. Teruel
as 4:2023cv03536
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Melinda Teruel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Lu v. Vivente 1, Inc.
as 5:2023cv02799
Plaintiff:
Kai Lu
Defendant:
Vivente 1, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.