Cases 11 - 20 of 6,823
CHRISTOPHE v. DOE
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
ILMART CHRISTOPHE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
DAVIS, BRICE GOOGLE, D WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant:
R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. WATKINS et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
WATKINS, T FRAZURE, J BURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLVILLE v. CHESTNUT et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
JACOB MONROE COLVILLE
Defendant:
T CHESTNUT and ESCAMBIA COUNTY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACFADDIN v. BLACKWATER RIVER CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION FACILITY CENTER
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH COLEMAN MACFADDIN
Defendant:
BLACKWATER RIVER CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION FACILITY CENTER, CENTURION MEDICAL CENTER and SEAN G PAVOLKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISOTPHER HELMS, J HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant:
BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
