Cases 11 - 20 of 7,287
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MCKENZIE v. REGIESTER
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
TIMOTHY REGIESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FISHBURN v. SOUTHEASTERN GROCERS INC
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FISHBURN
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN GROCERS, INC. d/b/a Winn-Dixie Supermarket
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
as 4:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
RITA C TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
OSBORNE v. MCCORMICK
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
ALAN OSBORNE
Defendant:
CLAYTON ADKINSON, WILLIAM MCCORMICK and CLAY ADKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATACCHIERO v. MCCORMICK
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAN MATACCHIERO
Defendant:
CLAY ADKINSON and WILLIAM MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
RIVAZ v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JARREL DANIEL RIVAZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEIL, JOSEPH HUTCHISON and KRISTIAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLASSMAN v. OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
John Glassman, as Curator of The Estate of James Bryan Chestnut and JOHN GLASSMAN
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA, James Filpi, Clinton Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
