Cases 11 - 20 of 15,331
Landreth v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
David Landreth
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and George LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez, Jason T. v. Puentes et al
as 0:2024cv60740
Plaintiff:
Jason Tomas Fernandez
Defendant:
Yendi Puentes, Mathew Correa, Scott Shammil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulk v. Sessler et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tiffany J Paulk
Defendant:
FNU Sessler and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Blizzard et al
as 6:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Defendant:
Attorney Jason T Blizzard, Circuit Judge Kathryn D. Weston and Asst State Attorney Amie M Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustin, Jose A. v. Lin et al
as 9:2024cv80551
Plaintiff:
Jose Anderson Augustin
Defendant:
Adam Lin and Swigert Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, REGION 1 PHARMACY and FNU PAWKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Achey v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Achey
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mills v. Clay County Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills, Wallace v. Clay County Courts et al
as 1:2024cv21635
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
