Cases 11 - 20 of 477
CHS Inc. v. Cotton et al
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
CHS Inc. and CHS, INC.
Defendant:
Daniel Cotton and DAC Family Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hudu Technologies, Inc. v. Hudu, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
HUDU TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
HUDU, INC. and Derreck Stratton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Proplanner, Inc. v. IPSUM
as 4:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Proplanner, Inc.
Defendant:
IPSUM d/b/a PRO PLANNER and IPSUM doing business as Pro Planner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Nuhn Industries Ltd v. Bazooka Farmstar LLC
as 3:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Nuhn Industries Ltd
Defendant:
Bazooka Farmstar LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
v. HUDU TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 4:2022cv00436
Defendant:
HUDU TECHNOLOGIES, INC., HUDU, INC. and Derreck Stratton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
HUDU TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 4:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
HUDU TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Regenexx, LLC v. Rejuv Medical, PA et al
as 4:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Regenexx, LLC
Defendant:
Rejuv Medical, PA, Dr. Joel Baumgartner, Dr. Michael Meighen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Nuhn Industries Ltd v. Bazooka Farmstar LLC
as 3:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Nuhn Industries Ltd
Defendant:
Bazooka Farmstar LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Critical Response Group, Inc. v. GeoComm, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Critical Response Group, Inc.
Defendant:
GeoComm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Farmers National Company v. Whitaker et al
as 4:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Farmers National Company
Defendant:
David Whitaker, Whitaker Marketing Group, LLC and David M. Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
