Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Graham v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02227
Plaintiff:
Jerry Graham
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Raschen v. USD 506 Altamont, Kansas
as 6:2020cv01018
Plaintiff:
Edward Raschen
Defendant:
Unified School District No. 506 and USD 506 Altamont, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Federal Uniformed Services Employment/Re-Employment Act
Monroe v. Propak Logistics, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Monroe
Defendant:
Propak Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Conner v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2021cv02382
Plaintiff:
Chris Conner
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tanner v. Keystone Automotive Operations Midwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02372
Plaintiff:
Richard Tanner
Defendant:
Keystone Automotive Operations Midwest, Inc., Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc., Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rumford v. High Choice Feeders, LLC et al.
as 6:2021cv01192
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Rumford and Tyrone L. Rumford
Defendant:
High Choice Feeders, LLC, High Choice Cattle, LLC, High Choice Grain, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail Inc
as 5:2021cv04039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Holt
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miles v. Karya Kansas Property Management, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02006
Defendant:
Karya Kansas Property Management, LLC and Nitya Capital, LLC
Plaintiff:
Morgan Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Morse v. Monarch Investment & Management Group, LLC
as 2:2021cv02178
Defendant:
Monarch Investment & Management Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Morse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Titan Protection & Consulting
as 2:2021cv02122
Defendant:
Titan Protection & Consulting
Plaintiff:
Melanie M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
