Cases 11 - 20 of 11,534
Batten v. McBurney
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Emory Batten
Defendant:
Judge McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Ronald Brawner
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Chambers
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
John William Martin
Respondent:
Warden Brian Chambers
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hill
Respondent:
Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Quint Lavert Evans
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ADAN v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
SALEEBAN ISSE ADAN
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. White
as 1:2024cv01570
Petitioner:
Jamar Scott
Respondent:
Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
