Cases 201 - 207 of 207
Tate v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2008cv04811
Plaintiff:
Kesha M. Tate
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Hickey
as 0:2008cv04769
Plaintiff:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Kathryn A. Hickey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Matthew v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2008cv04610
Plaintiff:
Albert David Matthew
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Lichsinn Thomas v. Schwan's Disability Program et al
as 0:2008cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Lichsinn Thomas and Kimberly S. Lichsinn Thomas
Defendant:
Schwan's Disability Program and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Walsh v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2007cv02505
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Walsh
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Backlund et al
as 0:2007cv02124
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Kathleen Backlund and 10157 North Chestnut Circle, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nelson v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2007cv01588
Plaintiff:
Marilyn R Nelson
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
