Antitrust Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,289
SPENCER et al v. REALPAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01019
Plaintiff: ELAINE SPENCER
Defendant: REALPAGE, INC., STERLING APARTMENT HOMES, AIR COMMUNITIES REIT CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00828
Plaintiff: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK HOLDINGS, LLC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00757
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff: FWK HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00480
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff: MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00429
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff: MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
GRAHAM et al v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff: NORMAN H. GRAHAM and RYAN W. GRAHAM
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Value Drug Company v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2022mc00066
Plaintiff: VALUE DRUG COMPANY
Defendant: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES INC and others
Petitioner: Lars Taavola and Ken Cappel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ZERO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. THE CLOROX COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv03989
Plaintiff: ZERO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant: THE CLOROX COMPANY and BRITA, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Mendy et al v. Boxrec et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff: Edward Bissau Mendy, Brendon Denes, Ivana Habazin and others
Defendant: Boxrec, John Sheppard, Samson Lu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
ANDREWS INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, INC v. YOKOGAWA CORPORATION OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00193
Plaintiff: ANDREWS INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, INC
Defendant: YOKOGAWA CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?