Cases 21 - 30 of 129
Ferguson v. The J.M. Smucker Company
as 5:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Tyneisha Ferguson
Defendant:
The J.M. Smucker Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hale v. Bell Co. Jailer et al
as 6:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Hale
Defendant:
Gary Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bozeman v. Salmons et al
as 3:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
David Bozeman
Defendant:
C/O Salmons, C/O Lutz, C/O Douglous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Bell Co. Jailer et al
as 3:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Hale
Defendant:
Bell Co. Jailer and Gary Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Ferguson
as 4:2022cv00059
Petitioner:
Antonio Cordera Douglas
Respondent:
Jessie Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esper v. Ferguson
as 2:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Christopher Esper
Respondent:
Warden Jessie Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Crews et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Respondent:
Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson, Judge John R. Grise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renfro v. People Of The State Of KY et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Renfro
Defendant:
People Of The State Of KY, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Ferguson
as 1:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
Randall E. Banks
Respondent:
Jessie Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. Crews et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Melvin Porter Carson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Jessie Ferguson, Thomas Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
