Cases 21 - 30 of 1,172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00542
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Andersen v. Li et al
as 2:2024mc00082
Defendant:
Longsheng Lei, Wei Li and Haojie Yan
Plaintiff:
Chapter 7 Trustee Ryan A. Andersen
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In Re Young Kang Las Vegas Assisted Living Center, LLC
as 2:2024mc00083
Defendant:
Roe Corporations, U.S.A. First Construction and Decoration, Inc., Haojie Yan and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan A. Andersen
Debtor:
Young Kang Las Vegas Assisted Living Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
